I reviewed kelly_project4, vail_project4, and project_4, for my art criticism article, however, I chose Sessana_project4 to review. I chose, "Full-Figured" by Nicholas Sessanna to review because of them all, his exhibit was the most professional, followed the assignment guidelines and had an interesting theme.
The challenges I faced in writing the article was trying to remain as objective as I could. To overcome this challenge, I only concluded the criticism with a compliment to his effort and recommendation for viewers to take in the exhibit. I tried to imagine myself doing a commentary in a local paper, or on a local news station.
I enjoyed critiquing my peers work, it provided an opportunity to have "dialect" regarding work much the same way a traditional studio class room has critiques.
I would like to read the critique my peers wrote about my Art Curation Project. I embrace constructive criticism because it helps me to grow as an artist and a professional. It is a way to receive other thoughts that I may not have considered.
I rate my article a 9, because it is just shy of a full two pages, but I do feel I covered the information expected.
I enjoyed working on this project because in this virtual setting, I can play the role of a professional in the art world, without feeling self conscious. It has really given me something to think about as a possible career path.
No comments:
Post a Comment